ELF vs WMT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ELF presents a stark contrast between explosive growth and deteriorating financial health, evidenced by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9. While the company maintains impressive revenue growth (37.8%) and a consistent track record of earnings beats, the valuation remains stretched relative to the Graham Number ($13.32) and Intrinsic Value ($52.22). The stock is currently in a severe technical downtrend, losing 46% of its value in the last six months, compounded by bearish insider selling from the CEO. The discrepancy between a strong operating margin (13.8%) and a negative profit margin (-0.23%) suggests significant non-operating pressures that warrant caution.
WMT shows bearish fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Concerns include weak profitability or high valuation.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ELF vs WMT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) and Walmart Inc. (WMT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.