JACK vs JAKK
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
JACK exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a negative Price-to-Book ratio (-0.23), indicating negative shareholder equity. While the forward P/E of 2.97 and a 15.71% dividend yield appear attractive, they are classic 'value trap' indicators given the -5.80% revenue growth and a 5-year price collapse of 88.8%. The combination of negative net profit margins, poor liquidity (Current Ratio 0.66), and consistent earnings misses (0/4 beats) suggests a deteriorating business model.
JAKK exhibits significant fundamental weakness, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and negative operating margins. While the current price ($21.82) sits near the Graham Number ($20.61), it is priced substantially higher than its growth-based intrinsic value of $6.02. A critical red flag is the dividend payout ratio of 116.28%, indicating the dividend is currently unsustainable. Despite a clean balance sheet and low debt, shrinking revenues and a bearish technical trend suggest a lack of organic growth momentum.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
JACK vs JAKK: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) and JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.