No connection

Search Results

MLM vs NTR

MLM
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$612.85
Market Cap
$36.96B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
85%
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
BULLISH
Price
$76.00
Market Cap
$36.57B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
MLM
37.46
NTR
16.31
Forward P/E
MLM
26.42
NTR
14.75
P/B Ratio
MLM
3.68
NTR
1.45
P/S Ratio
MLM
6.01
NTR
1.41
EV/EBITDA
MLM
20.34
NTR
8.86

Profitability

Gross Margin
MLM
30.8%
NTR
32.17%
Operating Margin
MLM
23.09%
NTR
12.68%
Profit Margin
MLM
18.49%
NTR
8.74%
ROE
MLM
10.16%
NTR
9.22%
ROA
MLM
4.99%
NTR
4.17%

Growth

Revenue Growth
MLM
8.6%
NTR
5.7%
Earnings Growth
MLM
-4.1%
NTR
414.7%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
MLM
0.6
NTR
0.47
Current Ratio
MLM
3.57
NTR
1.34
Quick Ratio
MLM
0.88
NTR
0.58

Dividends

Dividend Yield
MLM
0.54%
NTR
2.89%
Payout Ratio
MLM
19.83%
NTR
46.78%

AI Verdict

MLM BEARISH

MLM exhibits a stable but mediocre financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and no available Altman Z-Score. The stock is severely overvalued, trading at $612.85, which is more than double its Graham Number ($247.45) and over five times its growth-based intrinsic value ($114.52). While revenue shows modest growth, earnings are trending downward both YoY (-4.10%) and Q/Q (-5.10%), creating a dangerous disconnect between price and fundamental performance. The bearish technical trend (0/100) further suggests a lack of market momentum to support these premium valuations.

Strengths
Strong current ratio (3.57) indicating excellent short-term liquidity
Healthy operating margins (23.09%) and profit margins (18.49%)
Low dividend payout ratio (19.83%) providing significant room for future increases
Risks
Extreme valuation gap relative to Graham Number and Intrinsic Value
Negative earnings growth (YoY -4.10%, Q/Q -5.10%)
High PEG ratio (3.16) indicating the stock is overpriced relative to its growth rate
NTR BULLISH

NTR presents a stable financial profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a current price ($76.00) trading nearly in line with its Graham Number ($74.22) and significantly below its intrinsic value ($137.47). The company exhibits strong value characteristics, highlighted by a highly attractive PEG ratio of 0.58 and a P/E ratio well below the sector average. While the technical trend score is bearish, the underlying fundamentals and recent price performance suggest a strong recovery. The balance sheet is healthy with a low debt-to-equity ratio, supporting a sustainable dividend payout.

Strengths
Significant undervaluation relative to intrinsic value ($137.47)
Highly attractive PEG ratio (0.58) suggesting growth is underpriced
Strong balance sheet with low Debt/Equity (0.47) compared to sector average (1.10)
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates only stable, not strong, financial health
Low Quick Ratio (0.58) suggests potential short-term liquidity pressure
High volatility in quarterly earnings surprises with frequent misses

Compare Another Pair

MLM vs NTR: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile