No connection

Search Results

TRS vs WINA

TRS
TriMas Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$38.27
Market Cap
$1.44B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
80%
WINA
Winmark Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$400.30
Market Cap
$1.43B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
TRS
21.5
WINA
36.16
Forward P/E
TRS
18.4
WINA
33.11
P/B Ratio
TRS
2.04
WINA
-26.64
P/S Ratio
TRS
2.23
WINA
16.85
EV/EBITDA
TRS
34.01
WINA
27.27

Profitability

Gross Margin
TRS
21.4%
WINA
96.67%
Operating Margin
TRS
-3.38%
WINA
59.29%
Profit Margin
TRS
18.61%
WINA
48.19%
ROE
TRS
10.53%
WINA
--
ROA
TRS
0.83%
WINA
91.8%

Growth

Revenue Growth
TRS
-31.8%
WINA
-4.9%
Earnings Growth
TRS
1360.7%
WINA
-7.7%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
TRS
0.74
WINA
--
Current Ratio
TRS
2.52
WINA
2.74
Quick Ratio
TRS
0.77
WINA
2.39

Dividends

Dividend Yield
TRS
0.42%
WINA
1.02%
Payout Ratio
TRS
8.99%
WINA
34.63%

AI Verdict

TRS NEUTRAL

TriMas Corporation presents a contradictory profile with a stable Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a strong 1-year price return of 90%, yet it suffers from severe fundamental deterioration. While the company maintains a healthy Debt/Equity ratio (0.74) and strong liquidity (Current Ratio 2.52), the massive YoY revenue decline of -31.80% and a negative operating margin (-3.38%) are critical concerns. The discrepancy between the Graham Number ($27.40) and the Intrinsic Value ($52.51) suggests the market is pricing in a recovery that is not yet supported by top-line growth. Overall, the stock is a speculative hold until revenue stabilizes.

Strengths
Strong liquidity position with a Current Ratio of 2.52
Manageable leverage with Debt/Equity at 0.74, below sector average
Positive net profit margin (18.61%) significantly outperforming sector peers
Risks
Severe revenue contraction (-31.80% YoY and -161.38% Q/Q)
Negative operating margin (-3.38%) indicating core business inefficiency
Low Piotroski F-Score (4/9) suggesting mediocre financial health
WINA BEARISH

WINA exhibits a concerning disconnect between its market valuation and fundamental performance, characterized by a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 (Stable) and a massive premium over its intrinsic value of $77.49. While the company maintains exceptional operating and gross margins, it is currently experiencing negative revenue (-4.90%) and earnings growth (-7.70%). The valuation is unsustainable with a P/S ratio of 16.85 and a negative Price/Book ratio, suggesting significant equity erosion or aggressive buybacks. Combined with a 0% earnings beat rate over the last four quarters and bearish insider selling, the risk-to-reward profile is unfavorable.

Strengths
Exceptional gross margins (96.67%) indicating a highly efficient business model
Strong operating margins (59.29%) and high ROA (91.80%)
Healthy liquidity with a current ratio of 2.74
Risks
Severe overvaluation relative to intrinsic value ($400.30 vs $77.49)
Negative year-over-year revenue and earnings growth
Consistent failure to meet earnings estimates (0/4 beats in last 4 quarters)

Compare Another Pair

TRS vs WINA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares TriMas Corporation (TRS) and Winmark Corporation (WINA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile