ACGL vs BRK-A
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ACGL exhibits mixed fundamental signals: the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates a borderline stable financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about default risk, particularly given the low quick ratio of 0.50. The stock trades at a compelling 8.06x P/E, well below the sector average of 30.46, and the Graham Number of $130.62 suggests undervaluation, though the intrinsic value estimate of $342.2 implies a significant growth premium. Strong profitability (22.07% margin, 19.54% ROE) and consistent earnings beats (16.97% average surprise) support upside potential, but the lack of dividends and bearish insider activity undermine confidence. The 1-year return of +3.4% lags behind peers, reflecting market skepticism despite solid fundamentals.
BRK-A shows bearish fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is weak (F-Score 3/9). Concerns include weak profitability or high valuation.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ACGL vs BRK-A: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-A) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.