ACGL vs MA
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ACGL exhibits mixed fundamental signals: the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates a borderline stable financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about default risk, particularly given the low quick ratio of 0.50. The stock trades at a compelling 8.06x P/E, well below the sector average of 30.46, and the Graham Number of $130.62 suggests undervaluation, though the intrinsic value estimate of $342.2 implies a significant growth premium. Strong profitability (22.07% margin, 19.54% ROE) and consistent earnings beats (16.97% average surprise) support upside potential, but the lack of dividends and bearish insider activity undermine confidence. The 1-year return of +3.4% lags behind peers, reflecting market skepticism despite solid fundamentals.
MA shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is strong (F-Score 6/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ACGL vs MA: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.