AGO vs MARA
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, indicating poor financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a definitive distress risk assessment. Despite this, AGO trades below the Graham Number of $148.07 at $83.26, suggesting potential undervaluation, supported by a low P/E of 10.36 versus sector average of 22.56. However, declining earnings growth (YoY: -31.20%) and negative insider sentiment counterbalance value appeal. Analysts recommend a 'buy' with a $107.00 target, implying upside, but inconsistent quarterly execution and bearish technical trend temper near-term optimism.
MARA exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 and an operating margin of -598.83%. Despite a 'Buy' recommendation from analysts, the company is suffering from negative revenue growth (-5.60%) and catastrophic earnings declines. The combination of bearish insider selling by the CEO and CFO, coupled with a 0/100 technical trend, suggests a lack of confidence in the current operational trajectory. The stock is essentially a speculative bet on Bitcoin price action rather than a fundamentally sound business.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AGO vs MARA: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.