No connection

Search Results

AHL vs GNW

AHL
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limite
BEARISH
Price
$37.26
Market Cap
$3.42B
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
68%
GNW
Genworth Financial, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$8.90
Market Cap
$3.45B
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
AHL
5.48
GNW
16.48
Forward P/E
AHL
7.58
GNW
22.25
P/B Ratio
AHL
1.23
GNW
0.4
P/S Ratio
AHL
1.07
GNW
0.47
EV/EBITDA
AHL
4.0
GNW
8.4

Profitability

Gross Margin
AHL
35.02%
GNW
7.36%
Operating Margin
AHL
17.55%
GNW
2.41%
Profit Margin
AHL
14.22%
GNW
3.05%
ROE
AHL
13.97%
GNW
3.65%
ROA
AHL
1.83%
GNW
0.38%

Growth

Revenue Growth
AHL
1.6%
GNW
0.1%
Earnings Growth
AHL
157.2%
GNW
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
AHL
0.1
GNW
0.25
Current Ratio
AHL
0.78
GNW
10.49
Quick Ratio
AHL
0.35
GNW
1.06

Dividends

Dividend Yield
AHL
--
GNW
--
Payout Ratio
AHL
0.0%
GNW
0.0%

AI Verdict

AHL BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of just 3/9, indicating significant operational and balance sheet concerns. Despite a low P/E of 5.48 and a Graham Number of $67.98—suggesting substantial undervaluation—the company's deteriorating liquidity (Current Ratio: 0.78, Quick Ratio: 0.35) and poor technical trend (10/100) raise red flags. Earnings growth is volatile, with recent Q/Q EPS contraction of -11.5% despite strong YoY gains, while insider sentiment is tepid at 40/100. The absence of a dividend and lack of Altman Z-Score further undermine confidence in stability.

Strengths
Low P/E ratio of 5.48 well below sector average of 22.56, indicating potential undervaluation
High profitability margins: 14.22% net margin and 17.55% operating margin
Strong ROE of 13.97%, outperforming sector average of -15.97%
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates weak financial health and high risk of value trap
Critically low liquidity: Current Ratio of 0.78 and Quick Ratio of 0.35 suggest potential solvency concerns
Missing Altman Z-Score prevents distress risk assessment but low liquidity implies possible danger
GNW NEUTRAL

Genworth Financial presents a classic value trap profile, characterized by a stable Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a significant discount to book value (P/B 0.40). While the Graham Number of $16.47 suggests substantial defensive value, this is heavily offset by an intrinsic value of $3.78 and a severe collapse in earnings growth (-63.6% YoY). The company maintains a strong liquidity position with a current ratio of 10.49, but stagnant revenue growth (0.10%) and thin profit margins indicate a lack of operational momentum. The divergence between the low P/B and the crashing EPS suggests the market is pricing in long-term structural headwinds despite recent short-term price gains.

Strengths
Deeply undervalued relative to book value (P/B 0.40)
Strong short-term liquidity with a Current Ratio of 10.49
Low leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.25
Risks
Severe earnings deterioration with YoY EPS growth of -63.6%
Stagnant top-line growth (Revenue Growth YoY: 0.10%)
Extremely thin profit margins (3.05%) and low ROE (3.65%)

Compare Another Pair

AHL vs GNW: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Aspen Insurance Holdings Limite (AHL) and Genworth Financial, Inc. (GNW) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile