AMAL vs MA
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AMAL's Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates a weak financial health profile, signaling potential operational inefficiencies or instability despite solid profitability metrics. The absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about default risk, especially given the lack of available leverage and liquidity data. While the stock trades below its intrinsic value of $80.65 and Graham Number of $45.21, suggesting undervaluation, the current price of $38.10 is significantly below both benchmarks, implying either deep value or market skepticism. Strong earnings growth (11.1% YoY) and consistent beat rates (3/4 in last 4 quarters) support future potential, but technical trends and insider selling undermine near-term momentum.
MA shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is strong (F-Score 6/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AMAL vs MA: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.