BF-A vs HRL
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard shows a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, indicating stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. Despite solid profitability metrics like a 29.44% operating margin and 20.67% ROE, the company faces significant headwinds with negative revenue and earnings growth. Valuation appears stretched relative to intrinsic value models, and insider selling, weak price performance, and declining fundamentals reinforce caution. The stock trades well above the Graham Number of $18.3, suggesting overvaluation absent exceptional growth—contradicted by current contraction trends.
HRL exhibits a stark divergence between its balance sheet health and operational performance. While the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates strong financial health and the Debt/Equity ratio (0.04) is exemplary, the company is struggling with negative YoY revenue (-2.90%) and earnings growth (-5.10%). The current price of $21.47 trades at a premium to the Graham Number ($17.0) and significantly above the growth-based intrinsic value ($6.23). Most critically, the dividend payout ratio of 130.62% is unsustainable, suggesting a high risk of a dividend cut to align with actual earnings.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BF-A vs HRL: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-A) and Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.