BGSI vs MAT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
BGSI's Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health, signaling deterioration in operational efficiency and profitability trends. The absence of an Altman Z-Score raises concern about bankruptcy risk, especially given a high debt/equity ratio of 1.59 and a current ratio of 0.69, both below safe thresholds. Despite strong earnings growth (284.6% YoY), the company trades at a stretched forward P/E of 39.13 and a current P/E of 218.41, far exceeding sector averages and intrinsic value estimates. The Graham Number ($25.65) and intrinsic value ($21.83) suggest significant overvaluation, with the current price of $161.62 implying a premium driven by speculative growth expectations. Technical trends are bearish, and insider activity is neutral, further undermining confidence.
Mattel exhibits a strong deterministic health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating robust operational efficiency and financial stability. However, this fundamental strength is offset by a severe bearish technical trend (0/100) and concerning earnings decay, with YoY earnings growth at -18.50%. While the stock is priced near its Graham Number ($14.38), suggesting fair value from a defensive standpoint, the divergence between revenue growth (+7.30%) and earnings contraction suggests significant margin pressure. The outlook remains neutral as the low valuation provides a floor, but the lack of earnings momentum prevents a bullish rating.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BGSI vs MAT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Boyd Group Services Inc. (BGSI) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.