No connection

Search Results

EL vs GIS

EL
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$77.82
Market Cap
$28.15B
Sector
Consumer Defensive
AI Confidence
85%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$47.41
Market Cap
$25.29B
Sector
Consumer Defensive
AI Confidence
72%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
EL
--
GIS
8.96
Forward P/E
EL
25.84
GIS
10.09
P/B Ratio
EL
6.98
GIS
2.67
P/S Ratio
EL
1.92
GIS
1.32
EV/EBITDA
EL
15.63
GIS
10.31

Profitability

Gross Margin
EL
74.32%
GIS
34.39%
Operating Margin
EL
14.26%
GIS
15.6%
Profit Margin
EL
-1.21%
GIS
15.24%
ROE
EL
-4.34%
GIS
30.87%
ROA
EL
4.42%
GIS
6.22%

Growth

Revenue Growth
EL
5.6%
GIS
-6.8%
Earnings Growth
EL
--
GIS
115.5%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
EL
2.33
GIS
1.51
Current Ratio
EL
1.36
GIS
0.66
Quick Ratio
EL
0.9
GIS
0.35

Dividends

Dividend Yield
EL
1.8%
GIS
5.15%
Payout Ratio
EL
471.43%
GIS
45.56%

AI Verdict

EL BEARISH

The Estée Lauder Companies (EL) exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating deteriorating financial health. While the company maintains strong gross margins (74.32%) and has a history of beating earnings estimates, these are overshadowed by an unsustainable dividend payout ratio of 471.43% and a high Debt/Equity ratio of 2.33. Massive insider selling exceeding $1 billion and a catastrophic 5-year price decline of 73.5% suggest a lack of confidence from internal stakeholders and long-term investors. Despite analyst 'buy' recommendations, the combination of negative ROE and weak deterministic scores points to significant structural risk.

Strengths
Very high gross margins (74.32%) indicating strong brand pricing power
Consistent track record of beating quarterly earnings estimates (3/4 recently)
Positive operating margin (14.26%) despite negative net profit
Risks
Unsustainable dividend payout ratio (471.43%) suggesting a high risk of dividend cut
Weak financial health as evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9
High leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.33
GIS NEUTRAL

General Mills (GIS) trades at a steep discount to peers with a P/E of 8.96 versus a sector average of 22.53, supported by a robust 5.15% dividend yield and strong earnings execution, having beaten estimates in 3 of the last 4 quarters. However, the stock faces persistent headwinds from -6.80% YoY revenue growth and declining top-line momentum over the past three years, with 3Y and 1Y price returns of -31.6% and -23.4%, respectively. While profitability remains solid—ROE of 30.87% and operating margin of 15.60%—leverage is elevated at 1.51 D/E and liquidity is weak (current ratio 0.66), raising concerns about financial flexibility. Analysts are tepid with a 'hold' consensus and a $53.53 target implying only 12.9% upside, while recent insider selling adds a bearish signal.

Strengths
Attractive valuation with P/E of 8.96, significantly below sector average of 22.53 and peer TGT (10.48), CL (21.86), and MNST (40.52)
High dividend yield of 5.15% well-covered by a 45.56% payout ratio, offering income appeal in a defensive sector
Strong earnings quality: beat EPS estimates in 3 of last 4 quarters with average surprise of 4.54% and 107.7% Q/Q earnings growth
Risks
Revenue contraction of -6.80% YoY with no signs of inflection, contrasting peer MNST (+16.8%) and sector average growth of +5.46%
Deteriorating market sentiment: 3Y return of -31.6% and 1Y return of -23.4%, underperforming all major peers except TGT
Elevated leverage with Debt/Equity of 1.51, though below sector average of 3.28, limits financial flexibility and increases refinancing risk

Compare Another Pair

EL vs GIS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile