No connection

Search Results

BPOP vs HUT

BPOP
Popular, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$121.97
Market Cap
$8.24B
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
72%
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
BEARISH
Price
$66.08
Market Cap
$7.33B
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BPOP
11.22
HUT
--
Forward P/E
BPOP
9.05
HUT
-20.83
P/B Ratio
BPOP
1.34
HUT
5.12
P/S Ratio
BPOP
2.87
HUT
31.17
EV/EBITDA
BPOP
--
HUT
-37.29

Profitability

Gross Margin
BPOP
0.0%
HUT
54.16%
Operating Margin
BPOP
36.11%
HUT
-497.74%
Profit Margin
BPOP
27.01%
HUT
-96.19%
ROE
BPOP
13.05%
HUT
-18.58%
ROA
BPOP
1.06%
HUT
-9.24%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BPOP
11.6%
HUT
179.2%
Earnings Growth
BPOP
45.5%
HUT
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BPOP
--
HUT
0.25
Current Ratio
BPOP
--
HUT
1.09
Quick Ratio
BPOP
--
HUT
0.2

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BPOP
2.37%
HUT
--
Payout Ratio
BPOP
25.27%
HUT
0.0%

AI Verdict

BPOP NEUTRAL

BPOP's deterministic health score is concerning with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial stability. Despite strong profitability metrics and robust earnings growth, the lack of Altman Z-Score and missing key financial data (Debt/Equity, cash/debt levels) limits confidence in structural safety. The stock trades below analyst target and intrinsic value estimates but faces headwinds from bearish insider activity and weakening technical momentum. Solid dividend coverage and sector-leading earnings surprises provide offsetting positives.

Strengths
High profitability with operating margin of 36.11% and ROE of 13.05%, well above sector average
Strong year-over-year earnings growth of 45.5% and consistent quarterly beats (3 out of last 4)
Attractive valuation relative to peers with P/E of 11.22 vs sector average of 21.55
Risks
Low Piotroski F-Score of 4 suggests weak financial health and potential balance sheet inefficiencies
Missing Altman Z-Score and debt/equity data raises concerns about leverage and distress risk
Bearish insider sentiment with $5.19M in net officer/director sales over last 6 months
HUT BEARISH

HUT exhibits severe fundamental distress, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, indicating a near-total failure of financial health metrics. While the stock has seen massive 1-year price appreciation and maintains a 'strong_buy' analyst consensus, there is a dangerous disconnect between market sentiment and operational reality. The company suffers from an unsustainable operating margin of -497.74% and a precarious liquidity position with a Quick Ratio of 0.20. Valuation is extreme, with a Price/Sales ratio of 31.17, suggesting the current price is driven by speculation rather than intrinsic value.

Strengths
Exceptional YoY Revenue Growth (179.20%)
Low Debt/Equity ratio (0.25) relative to sector average
Strong 1-year price performance (+463.4%)
Risks
Critical financial health (Piotroski F-Score 1/9)
Severe liquidity risk (Quick Ratio 0.20)
Extreme operational inefficiency (Operating Margin -497.74%)

Compare Another Pair

BPOP vs HUT: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Popular, Inc. (BPOP) and Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile